SoundCloud for Vic Sadot

Friday, July 19, 2013

Truth Troubadour Blog: Science Radio Show Host Michio Kaku Gave Michael S...

Truth Troubadour Blog: Science Radio Show Host Michio Kaku Gave Michael S...:On July 16, 2013 on KPFA, Michio Kaku , "Professor of Theoretical Physics" and host of a long-standing radio show called "Exploration". Science Radio Show Host Michio Kaku Gave Michael Shermer An Unskeptical Interview - Dr Kaku lets Dr Shermer ridicule Dr Steven Jones without even mentioning a single detail of his work or his research on samples of WTC dust. It is enough that he was "suspended" by his university. What does our host do to challenge Shermer? Kaku has no informed questions for Shermer to debunk! Is not a "debunking" supposed to actually take on the points that the other scientist or author actually makes? Does Kaku not owe Dr Steven Jones an opportunity to discuss his scientific "Hypothesis" on the show which allowed him to be ridiculed? Could he have Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth on a special show as well? http://truthtroubadour.blogspot.com/2013/07/science-radio-show-host-michio-kaku.html

Science Radio Show Host Michio Kaku Gave Michael Shermer An Unskeptical Interview

On July 16, 2013 on KPFA, Michio Kaku, "Professor of Theoretical Physics" and host of a long-standing radio show called "Exploration", gave a completely unscientific and unskeptical interview platform to Michael Shermer to discuss "The Borders of Science - Why People Believe Strange Things". And on July 19, 2013 RT Interview with Michio Kaku by Oksana Boyko, he really lost his "cool" when he tried to intellectually bully the young host. (July 19 Argument linked here and linked at bottom in the paragraph in yellow text added on 7-21-13.)


On July 16 Dr. Shermer is introduced as the "dean of debunkers", founder of The Skeptical Society, and a regular writer for Scientific American. Yet Shermer's technique is to include in that wierdo grab-bag of “strange beliefs” held by “otherwise smart people” a grab-bag of odd notions but not his own preposterous and completely unskeptical perspective on the official story of 9/11. Kaku allows Shermer to employ the anti-intellectual technique of ridicule in lieu of a rational analysis. In fact, Kaku joins in the non-science rudeness toward people not there to defend themselves, especially physicist Dr Steven Jones. 

Physicist Dr. Steven Jones describes explosive evidence that was found in WTC dust samples at the historic 2010 "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" San Francisco press conference while Erik Lawyer of "Firefighters for 9/11 Truth" and prolific author Dr. David Ray Griffin wait in the wings.

The long standing science show on NPR, all of the Pacifica radio stations, and syndicated to hundreds of other stations, has been strangely silent over these many years since 2001 on the scientific and forensic evidence of the events of 9/11/01. Like the Philip Zelikow-led 9/11 Commission Report, omissions and distortions abound in this rare and shamefully superficial “9/11 science” moment on Mister Kaku's show. No mention of Building 7 even as Kaku joins Shermer in the preposterous notion that World Trade Center buildings #1 and #2 disintegrated due to fuel and office fires and that no demolitions were involved. No discussion of the rate of fall in 10 seconds, nor any reference to the 100 plus year history of steel frame buidings.


After explaining "the skeptics movement", for which Shermer thinks himself the self-appointed leader of, the subjects go from 9/11, to talking with dead people, to creationist denial of Darwin, to superstitions, to UFO's, and so on in the mix of discrediting by association... Shermer gets to 9/11 at 11:45 in the hour long show and that segment goes to 19:20. Shermer acts shocked that he got "hundreds of letters from readers of Scientific American" angry with his debunking of 9/11”.


Hypothesis - 47 minutes film by Brett Smith on Dr Steven Jones

Dr Kaku lets Dr Shermer ridicule Dr Steven Jones without even mentioning a single detail of his work or his research on samples of WTC dust. It is enough that he was "suspended" by his university. What does our host do to challenge Shermer? Kaku has no informed questions for Shermer to debunk! Is not a "debunking" supposed to actually take on the points that the other scientist or author actually makes?

Watch "Hypothesis": Full Movie by Brett Smith (46:43) – The Story of Physicist Steven D. Jones and the World Trade Center 9/11 Dust Forensic Evidence of Thermitic Particles. 
Hypothesis - 47 minutes film by Brett Smith on Dr Steven Jones

Of course, Shermer does not address WTC Building 7 on the Kaku show, which was not hit by a plane and disintegrated in about 7 seconds. He claims that fires did not have to melt the tower buildings to make them collapse in about 10 seconds flat. 

Our popular “science guy”, Mr. Kaku, offers, without accreditation, that the architects designed the buildings to fall right into themselves. Should we not expect a citation for such a claim on a nominally unbiased scientific show? The only "residue" problem for Shermer is not what's found in the dust by Dr. Steven Jones and the international team which published a for-peer review report in The Open Chemical Physics Journal in 2009, but rather the residue of "unexplained anomalies". Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth article: “Advanced Pyrotechnic of Explosive Material Discovered in WTC Dust" by Gregg Roberts and Andrea Dreger.

Photo of thermitic spheres - Watch the 59 minute version of 
"9/11 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out"

Shermer begs the question in lieu of scientific evidence and common sense! He asks, why not just take bin Laden's word for it, after all, says Shermer, he claimed to have done it. Yet bin Laden denied his involvement, which was reported on CNN on 9-16-01. A fake video with a fatter African featured bin Laden was "found" in Afghanistan after the US invasion, which is largely discredited. But Shermer makes no attempt to document what he says as a real scientist or skeptic would do. 



From the CNN Memory Hole "Osama Bin Laden Releases Statement Denying Responsibility for 9/11 Attacks"

Where is the skepticism of these official histories? Shermer says that Bush was too "incompetent" to pull off 9/11. He reveals that he has not really ever studied the subject or that he has a hidden agenda. See "Joshua Blakeney and Anthony J. Hall Investigate Michael Shermer's Academic Credentials - Oct 17, 2010 (11:30) Pretender or Professor? Joshua Blakeney and Anthony J. Hall Investigate Michael Shermer's Academic Credentials." 



Shouldn't this trashing by ridicule and specious science actually be seen as an opportunity for the international 9/11 truth movement? After all, Kaku has put his scientific reputation on the line by hosting Shermer in a completely uncritical and endorsing manner. After all, Kaku has rather avoided the subject for nearly 12 years... So what is he trying to do now? How about some public discussion of an appropriate response to Kaku from the intellectual leadership of the 9/11 Truth movement in numerous countries at once? Does Kaku not owe Dr Steven Jones an opportunity to discuss his scientific "Hypothesis" on the show which allowed him to be ridiculed? He should have Richard Gage of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth on a special show as well.

Contact for Michio Kaku listed at KPFA web page for his show: mkaku@aol.com

Our “science guy”, Michio Kaku has won wide respect for his straight talk about the dangers of nuclear power and weapons. Take note of this: In the last 3 minutes of this one hour show, Kaku offers an editorial cover for himself. He talks about how everyone thought that reports of CIA mind control experiments were just crazy “conspiracy theories”. He concludes that in the wake of the revelations that came out during the Watergate era about the MK Ultra Mind Control program, it turns out that “sometimes the conspiracy theorists are right”.


On July 19 Kaku really lost his "cool" when he tried to intellectually bully RT Interviewer Oksana Boyco. In “Science of Democracy”, featuring an interview by Oksana Boyko with Science populizer Dr Michio Kaku 7-19-13 RT Worlds Apart Channel (29:14) Kaku is quite combative with Oksana. At 9:25 Kaku becomes quite rude and belligerent with the host at this point. He asks, “Are you a 'conspiracy theorist'?”. And he demands that she answer his question, “Who was behind 9/11?” He repeats it five times in rapid succession! You can hear him interrupt her every time she tries to answer. He is clearly trying to use the full weight of his celebrity “Science Guy” status to intimidate the young and articulate Russian journalist, Oksana Boyco.



Truth Troubadour Vic Sadot first sang 9/11 Truth songs at the Truth Emergency Convergence at American University on July 23, 2005 and outside the UN for New York 9/11 Truth on Sept 11, 2005. He has been a member of the Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance since 2008, and on Sept 11, 2011 Vic released a 16 song CD titled "9/11 Truth & Justice Songs", which is available at CD Baby. His official web site is www.vicsadot.com and he also blogs at Berkeley Calling and Broadside Balladeer blogs. Contact: TruthTroubadour@gmail.com 

Note: Excellent site by Daniel Noel called "9/11 Baby Step" posted in the comment section at KPFA for this particular show with Michael Shermer the unskeptical “skeptic” endorsing the pseudo-science of NIST and the 9/11 Commission Report based on Guantanamo torture testimony and Philip Zelikow creative myth writing.

2007 Debate between Dr James Fetzer and Dr Micheal Shermer

Debate Transcript Kevin Ryan vs Michael Shermer on Thom Hartmann



Recommend reading would be Jim Hoffman's article addressing Michael Shermer's history of attack pieces against 9/11 Truth titled “Scientific American's Dishonest Attack On 911Research” 7-13-05 by Jim Hoffman: “Shermer's attack could hardly be more hypocritical. He pays lip service to the kind of cumulative argument known as inference to the best explanation, which requires the consideration of all the relevant evidence. But he avoids the vast bodies of evidence cited by skeptics like David Ray Griffin, and fails to correctly state even a single one of their arguments. Instead, Shermer embeds mentions of the works of serious skeptics within a tapestry of ludicrous ideas so as to discredit them through guilt-by-association. This approach has nothing to do with science and everything to do with sophistry... Shermer's column exhibits many of the same propaganda techniques as the ambitious feature article in the March (2005) issue of Popular Mechanics by Benjamin Chertoff, for which Shermer professes admiration... Shermer uses an array of deceptive methods to persuade the reader that challenges to the official story of the 9/11 attack are worthy only of ridicule and should not be scrutinized. His primary technique is to use hoaxes and unscientific ideas - long promoted on the web and in videos - to bracket the valid ideas that he seeks to shield the reader from. That Shermer went to such great lengths to thoroughly misrepresent the painstaking, scientific, evidence-based work of 911Research is a testament to the site's success." http://www.911research.wtc7.net/essays/sciam/index.html

Friday, July 12, 2013

Truth Troubadour Blog: URGENT: Investigate Michael Hastings' Death - Abby...

Truth Troubadour Blog: URGENT: Investigate Michael Hastings' Death - Abby...: Abby Martin on RT Breaking the Set! 7-12-13: "Abby Martin takes a closer look at the death of award winning journalist Michael Has...

URGENT: Investigate Michael Hastings' Death - Abby Martin on RT TV



Abby Martin on RT Breaking the Set! 7-12-13: "Abby Martin takes a closer look at the death of award winning journalist Michael Hastings, featuring interviews with Michael's close friend, Joe Biggs, who suspects his death was not an accident, and Kimberly Dvorak, an investigative journalist who has been conducting an investigation into the anomalies despite stonewalling from the LAPD."


Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Truth Troubadour Blog: Abby Martin Skewers Bill Maher with Logic, Princip...

Truth Troubadour Blog: Abby Martin Skewers Bill Maher with Logic, Princip...: Bill Maher Democrat Lackey | Brainwash Update by Abby Martin on BREAKING THE SET on RT   This episode of “Brainwash Update” is o...

Abby Martin Skewers Bill Maher with Logic, Principles, Humor


This episode of “Brainwash Update” is one of the best and hardest-hitting analyses ever delivered by Abby Martin! And they are all good! For this episode, Martin's "Breaking the Set" YouTube Channel states: "Abby Martin calls out Bill Maher, host of HBO's 'Real Time', for his evolution from being a controversial commentator to being an arrogant lackey for the democratic party, citing his rampant Islamophobia, support for drones, and defense of the NSA's wiretapping program."


Abby's first clip is one from a long ago “Politically Incorrect” show in which Maher claimed that "we" (USA) were the cowards for lobbing missiles in from a safe distance of our adversaries, for which he was fired by ABC. Abby says that Maher has made a complete reversal of positions to “suck up to his corporate masters”, and she goes on a rapid roll-out of evidence to back up what she says.



In fact, Maher makes an extremely insensitive and racist joke about Muslims in general in an interview with CIA-trained CNN interviewer Cooper Anderson. Abby plays the clip. Anderson's wikipedia page states, “During college, Cooper spent two summers as an intern at the Central Intelligence Agency. Although he has no formal journalistic education, he opted to pursue a career in journalism rather than stay with the agency after school.” Instead of showing shock and disgust at this demonizing remark, Anderson smiles and lets it stand uncontested, thus encouraging millions of viewers to join in the hatred for billions of fellow human beings. If either Maher or Anderson feared a "real existential threat" from "terrorism" or "Muslims", would they talk like that about Muslims in general? As Abby Martin says, "statistically you are less likely to die of bee sting than a terrorist attack." 


She takes Maher to task for a recent Huffington Post op-ed article by Maher saying that "600 thousand Palestinians (expelled from their country) should have been  mature, enough to move on, the way the Jews did". Abby mocks that one saying, "Yeah, dude, Palestinians just need to grow up! They need to just waltz out of that open air prison and move on with their lives, right? But if that's not offensive enough, just wait! Because in addition to Occupation, Maher supports Stazi-like sureillance too! Just recently on his show he said, "I'm ok with spying now that Obama is in office.” She reams him again saying, "Grow up, man! Your complete trust in Democrats is not going to matter when the same spying program is adopted by the next Republican President. Although that does not matter to people like Bill Maher because his purpose, like that of John Stewart or Steven Colbert, is to be lackey for the Democratic Party."



Next she plays a clip of Maher presenting "a giant cartoon check" to the Obama Super PAC (Political Action Committee) fund for one million dollars "while fear-mongering that there is no other choice than to support a war criminal. And any time there's a real change amassing, Maher arrogantly rejects it." We are reminded by Abby of Maher's attempts at character assassination on the millions of citizen volunteers in the American grassroots movement demanding another “New Deal” between the 99% and the 1%, a movement. She points out that Maher once referring to the Occupy Wall Street movement as 'a bunch of douchebags who think throwing a chair through a Starbucks window is going to bring on the revolution'. Abby tells Bill Maher point blank what will bring on the revolution: "Yeah Bill, cuz you know what IS going to bring on the Revolution is giving millions of dollars to perpetuate endless war, the erosion of rights, and a climate of fear and hatred for one another." The Occupy Wall Street movement is better known for occupying public spaces, sharing food, having teach-ins, and holding open public assemblies of direct democratic participation than for 'throwing chairs' even when attacked by militarized police forces in nationally coordinated simultaneous attacks in numerous cities using phone conferences with the "Homeland Security", the FBI, and mostly Democratic Party big city mayors! 



Abby Martin concludes her Maher skewering with a final sledge-hammer blow that is reminiscent of the opening to her "Breaking the Set" TV show where she smashes a TV with a sledge-hammer while CNN's Wolf Blitzer is yapping propaganda and nonsense. Abby skewers Bill Maher with logic, principles, and humor. Political humor at its best because she exposes how one man's journey led him to financial success in a moral wasteland! "How far you've come, Bill! From the days of actually speaking controversial truths to becoming nothing more than an Establishment Puppet! Keeping the masses laughing and superficially 'informed', right? Hey! Whatever keeps the country divided and the money flowing.”

Truth Troubadour leaves you with a humorous and appropriate song to cap off your delightful Abby Martin skewering of Bill Maher experience. Today I chose "LOVE ME I'M A LIBERAL 2011" to dedicate to Mister Maher and his ilk. It's a free song at Sound Cloud/BroadsideBalladeer. Truth Troubadour's version for our times is an update by Vic Sadot of the Phil Ochs 1966 classic Love Me I'm A Liberal. Vic Sadot's 2011 version of "Love Me I'm A Liberal" was released on Sept 11, 2011 under license on the 16 song CD titled "9/11 Truth & JusticeSongs", which remains available on CD Baby! Enjoy the song! And be strong in struggle!




Saturday, May 18, 2013

CALIFORNIA DREAM BUSTED! Parents, Pot, Prohibition: Daisy Bram's Story

Daisy Bram and Jayme Walsh were living their California Dream. They had moved from Iowa to a rural mountain town in northern California where they began to home-birth and raise three children, to grow their own food and medical marijuana, and to integrate themselves into the mostly farming community where Daisy works as a midwife. Then came police raids into their home to seize their children, to put the husband in prison, with Daisy, the mother of three, currently out on bail and speaking out in their defense. Now the three children, Zeus, Thor, and Invictus are under the control and supervision of the Child Protective Services. The seizure of her car has left the young and vibrant mother of three stranded in a rural community with no transportation while facing charges of child endangerment. Fortunately, Daisy has a good lawyer named Michael Levinson working pro-bono on her behalf. There is also a growing community of support around this family's case and a legal defense fund has been established. See GreenAid - Daisy Bram Legal Defense FundThis is her heart-breaking story. Be sure to watch the video at bottom to hear her tell her story in her own words.

Parents, Pot, and Prohibition: California CPS Stole Daisy Bram's Children Because She Was Legally Growing Medical Marijuana 5-16-13 in OilFreeFun.com - "Daisy Bram has had her three young children taken from her, her husband locked up, and even her vehicle confiscated for growing marijuana "legally" in Northern California. This is the human cost of the for-profit "war on drugs", the for-profit prisons, the for-profit police state, and for-profit pharmaceutical lobbyists screwing up sane governance. Hopefully this heart-wrenching story turns the tide away from institutional insanity and towards freedom of medical choice."


From Reason.com: "In 2011, Daisy Bram and Jayme Walsh lived with their two small children, Thor and Zeus, in Butte County, California. Like so many other people in northern California, Bram and Walsh had medical marijuana recommendations and a small cannabis garden in their back yard. In September, their home was raided by Butte County sheriffs. Bram and Walsh were charged with cultivation of marijuana, possession with intent to sell, and child endangerment. Thor and Zeus were taken by Child Protective Services and placed in foster care for four months. A year later, Bram gave birth to their third son, Invictus. With their Butte County cases still unresolved, Bram and Walsh decided to move their family to neighboring Tehama County. In January of 2013, Tehama County sheriffs raided Bram and Walsh's new home. This time they found a cannabis garden in a locked room off the back of the house. Child Protective Services once again seized Bram and Walsh's children and placed them in foster care, where they remain to this day. On January 30, Tehama County officers seized Bram's car. Walsh is currently in jail with bail set at one million dollars. Bram is out on bail awaiting future court dates. "There is nothing worse that someone can be accused of than doing something to harm their own children. If someone from the government is going to come after someone and make that accusation, they better have the ammunition ready to go," said Michael Levinsohn, Daisy Bram's attorney."
See "Weed Wars: United States v. Marijuana"

WEED WARS - State of California v. Daisy Bram (2011-present, Butte County and Tehama County, CA) posted Jan 30, 2013, 11:43 PM by The Editor [ updated Mar 17, 2013, 9:06 PM ] “As of February 2013, Daisy Bram's children, all of whom are younger than three, have been removed from their mother's care and placed in the foster care system by Tehama County, CA authorities. She is in URGENT NEED of a family law attorney, child custody expert, advocate, or community leader near Tehama County to assist in regaining custody of her children (contact The Human Solution). Supporters are encouraged to donate to Daisy's legal defense fund through Green Aid. (Active links at the article site!) Daisy Bram and Jayme Walsh no longer enjoy a quiet life off the grid in rural northern California with their three children, living by the motto "Live simply so others can simply live." Like other residents of remote Concow, CA (near Oroville in unincorporated Butte County), Daisy and Jayme produced their own food and traded the bounty of their organic garden with other locals. Daisy Bram, a midwife who delivered her two youngest children at home, delivered another mother's baby into this world in January 2012, but her own three babies no longer live in her healthy, loving home. The children have been medicated against Daisy's will while in foster care and her newborn was switched to a formula diet in direct opposition to all of Daisy's natural spiritual motherhood ideals and practices.” Read more at: