Cheney's in the Bunker - Songwriter Cites Footnotes to Scholarly Research on the Crimes of 9/11/01

Cheney's in the Bunker was written in 2005 by Vic Sadot after reading page 201 of David Ray Griffin's critique of the official conspiracy story released in 2004. The 9/11 Commission Report told a story of 19 named Muslims who had allegedly been able to overcome the trillion dollar US intelligence and military apparatus to hijack 4 jets; to take down 3 World Trade Center buildings with 2 planes; to crash another jet in rural Pennsylvania fields; and to attack the US central military command's accounting department at the Pentagon a day after Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zackheim declared on 9/10/01 "a war on the bureaucracy" to find the missing 2.3 trillion dollars!

History Commons - Complete 911 Timeline - Dick Cheney's Actions on 9/11
Quote: Dick Cheney in the White House bunker, speaking to administration officials including (from left) Joshua Bolten, Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin (standing), Condoleezza Rice and I. Lewis ‘Scooter’ Libby. [Source: David Bohrer / White House]

There is much to say about 9/11, but here in this "Truth Troubadour" blog in this 16th year of prodigious research and reports that have been published by world class scholars, let us focus for a moment on the Vice President who was in the Presidential bunker at some very disputed time on the morning of 9/11/01. David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at Claremont School of Theology. The professor is a master logician and detective. Plus, he's articulate, genial, and funny! The opposite image of Alex Jones to brand the 9/11 Truth movement with. Thanks to folks like David Ray Griffin, I overcame my fears, and cited him as the source of my information, and released this song in a public way on 9/11/11 on a CD titled "9/11 Truth & Justice Songs". Below the lyrics you will see footnotes for this song.

David Ray Griffin

Photo credit: “Press for Truth” & “Geopolitical Report” at “Newsbud” 8-31-17 Kurt Nimmo

The Lies of 9/11 Miracle Workers: A Review of David Ray Griffin’s book “Bush And Cheney: How They Ruined America And The World” by Edward Curtin. Posted August 27, 2017 at Aletho News

Janice Mathews was a key organizer of a conference called the D.C. Emergency Truth Convergence on July 22 and 23, 2005 that my brother Rob and I got invited to sing for at American University. I sang at a 9/11 Truth rally in Lafayette Square across from the White House too. I sang "Mad Cowboy Disease" and "Are You A Citizen Or Are You A Slave" for the first time ever. I met a lot of great researchers, authors, and video makers that weekend! 

Rob Sadot on electric guitar with Vic Sadot on vocals and acoustic guitar doing a set of songs at American University for the D.C. Emergency Truth Convergence on July 23, 2005

Janice Mathews gave me a copy of David Ray Griffin's new book "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions & Distortions". The Joint Congressional Committee had released it's report in 2002 minus "28 pages" said to be top secret, and the 9/11 Commission released its report written by Philip Zelikow in 2004. So Griffin was able to effectively debunk the narrative in short order.

When I read about the completely "omitted testimony" of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, the information fairly jumped off the page at me! This calls for a song! Mineta describes how "a young man" kept asking Vice President Cheney, at intervals of 50, 30, and 10 miles, as he reported to Cheney that a plane was heading toward Washington, DC, the young officer asked, "Do the orders still stand?" By the third time, Mineta says, "Cheney whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand! Have you heard anything to the contrary?"

It left us all wondering what the orders were, a shoot down or a stand down?

For years the truth seeking world wondered who this unnamed "young man" Mineta mentioned in his omitted testimony actually was? Researchers eventually determined that he was Naval Aide Douglas Cochrane - See 911 Blogger. But when he was pressed to answer questions by journalists, he simply deferred to the 9/11 Commission Report as the final authority on the subject. Those who failed were all rewarded and promoted.

Thanks to the movie 9/11 In the Academic Community, we now know that 25% of the footnotes in that cover-up report came from Zelikow's use of torture "testimony"! 
Nobody at the Pentagon was warned or evacuated! This results in no demotions, reprimands, firings, or law suits? (Note: April Gallop's law suit was dismissed without being heard!) Nothing but praise and promotions for those who failed to protect the now deceased at military headquarters?

David Ray Griffin at the 9/11 Truth DC Emergency Truth Convergence 

at the National Press Club (57:54) 911TVorg YouTube Channel

Here at this 16th year of research and reports, the official story has been proven to be just as David Ray Griffin described it in an article titled The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie by David Ray Griffin, May 22, 2005, that was posted at www.911Truth.org 

Dr. Griffin led off with this: "In discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better title might have been “a 571-page lie.” (Actually, I was saying “a 567-page lie,” because I was forgetting to count the four pages of the Preface.) In making this statement, one of my points has been that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie: that the official story about 9/11 is true. Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie, The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my critique’s subtitle, “Omissions and Distortions.” Then Dr. Griffin said, "I now list (of 115 Lies cited) the omissions and claims of The 9/11 Commission Report that I, in my critique of that report, portrayed as lies." 

"Cheney's in the Bunker" was inspired and informed by the exposure of Lie #85, which David Griffin describes as: "The omission of Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta’s testimony, given to the Commission itself, that Vice-President Cheney and others in the underground shelter were aware by 9:26 that an aircraft was approaching the Pentagon (p.220).

Norman Mineta testimony to the 9/11 Commission at Derdy YouTube Channel

Cheney's in the Bunker is for the people willing to pay attention and willing to be challenged. I have had to change my opinion many times when new information has come my way. Why wouldn't we want to base our opinions on evidence and truth? To be willfully ignorant is a sad and insensitive reaction to a treasonous tragedy that led to so much unjustifiable war abroad and repressive laws at home.Songwriter Cites Footnotes to Scholarly Research on the Crimes of 9/11/01: Here is the video I made years ago for "Cheney's in the Bunker". It's one of my first videos and lacks the finesse later learned. It was posted at "Vic Sadot" & "Truth Troubadour" YouTube Channels.

Released on 9/11/11 Songs that question what happened 

and how the cover story was used

Cheney’s in the Bunker

Verse: 8 X Em D C Em

Cheney’s in the bunker …now we’re under attack (1)
Someone seized our jets... in a terror hijack…
They flew into the Towers with a mighty impact
The Trade Center fell in a total collapse…
Now Bush is in the classroom for a photo-op show…
The story of the goat is what he wants “kids” to know
The day is Nine-Eleven… year Two-Thousand and One
Now who the hell’s attacking us, and what’s to be done?

Chorus: 2 X G D C B7 / B7 Em Em Em

Do the orders still stand, sir? Do the orders still stand?
Do the orders still stand, sir? Do the orders still stand?
“Do the orders still stand?”

The Transportation Secretary, he testified (2 Norman Mineta, May 2003 Commission Staff Report)
By 9:20 AM he was by Cheney’s side
Cheney’s in charge in the White House war room
When did the teleconference start? And it involved whom? (3)
Mineta said a “young man” asked Cheney in doubt…
“Do the orders still stand, sir? They’re 50 miles out”
“They’re 30 miles out, sir…” He reports to command…
“The plane is 10 miles out, sir… Do the orders still stand?” (4) (chorus) - Instrumental

Cheney’s in the bunker… “Is it real or a drill?” (5)
They’re flying toward the Pentagon, the White House, the Hill…
Dubya’s with the children… lookin’ out of the loop…
The orders pass secretly within a small group…
The “young man” returns … He’s askin’ Cheney again!
“Do the orders still stand, sir?, He questions command…
Cheney “whipped his neck around, ‘of course!,’ says he,
‘Have you heard anything to the contrary?’”(6) (chorus)

Was there one order to “stand down”, and one “shoot to kill”?
At 9:38 the Pentagon was hit with great skill (7)
The cover for the capitol was sent out to sea!
That’s where they sent our fighter jets from loyal Langley! (8)
Incompetence, complicity, conspiracy?
Everyone of those requires a penalty!?
If Rumsfeld and Myers failed us all on that day?
Why was one promoted? Why’d the other one stay? (chorus) - Instrumental

Cheney’s in the bunker, “now” it’s not til near 10! (9 National Commission final report 2004)
They’re changing all the timelines we were given back then…
There’s no time “now” to stop the DC attack…
The Pentagon batteries couldn’t even fight back …
No “shoot down” order aimed at Flight 93… (10)
When passengers were on the verge of victory… (11)
Mineta was omitted from the final report…
Many other matters they dismiss and distort… (12) (chorus)

© 2005 Victor René Sadot/BMI/Orbian Love Songs

Please read my 12 footnotes to this song. And read The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions & Distortions by David Ray Griffin, author of The New Pearl Harbor, by Olive Branch Press: www.interlinkbooks.com

These footnotes are from the original release of the song lyrics in 2005, and some from From The Wilderness may no longer be functional. There is one additional citation from David Ray Griffin sent in on Sept 6, 2017 added to footnote #10 about the timelines having “been verified by three recently declassified Secret Service documents (contained in Griffin’s 2017 book, Bush and Cheney: How They Destroyed America and the World, p 239.)”. VRS

Footnotes to the song Cheney’s in the Bunker/Do the Orders Still Stand?

1. The “bunker” is actually called the Presidential Emergency Operations Center (PEOC). It is located in the basement of the east wing of the White House. Griffin, When Did Cheney Go to the Shelter? P 241.

2. Secretary of Transportion, Norman Mineta’s testimony before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks on the United States, Staff Report of May 23, 2003, available at:

www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2003/commissiontestimony052303.htm,

Griffin, p 208.

3. There were actually at least three teleconferences going on at once during the morning crisis of 9/11/01. Griffin explains who initiated them and what is known about them p 233.

4. The full quote of Vice President Cheney by Norman Mineta was actually, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” Commissioner Timothy Roemer did ask Mineta what he “assumed” the orders were. Mineta said that he assumed that “the orders” were to shoot any incoming attacks down (David Ray Griffin, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, page 220).

5. War games ongoing on 9/11/01: Griffin p 268 – 269; “Vigilant Guardian”, and “Vigilant Warrior”, and other drills on 9/11/01 raise questions about the military response and the purpose of those exercises. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reported to the Notheast Air Defense Sector (NEADS) of the North American Airospace Defense Command (NORAD) that they have “hijacked aircraft headed to New York and ‘need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there.” The person at NEADS replies, “Is this real-world or exercise?” Richard Clarke, Against All Enemies, p 5; Peter Lance, Cover Up, p 226, citing William B Scott, “Exercise Jump-Starts Response to Attacks,” Aviation Week and Space Technology, June 3, 2002;

www.aviation.now.com/content/publications/awst/20020603/avi_stot.htm,

and Mike Kelly, “Atlantic City F-16 Fighters Were Eight Minutes Away From 9/11 Hijacked Planes”; Michael Kane, “The Final Fraud: The 9/11 Commission Closes Its Doors to the Public: Cover-Up Complete,” From the Wilderness Publications

www.fromthewilderness.com/members/071204_final_fraud.shtml

6. Griffin, p 220/ Richard Clarke, Against All Enemies, p 5.

7. Changing Timelines, Griffin chart p 152, 153.

8. Griffin, p 201/National Commission Staff Report, March 23.2004, quoted in Paul Thompson’s The Terror Timeline, 424, 426.

9. Ongoing teleconferences involving Rumsfeld, Myers, Cheney, Clarke, Rice, etc. Griffin p 208, Richard Clark at 9:39 am, “I can still see Rumsfeld on the screen, so the whole building didn’t get hit.” Three simultaneous teleconferences going on 9/11/01 p 230 – 235.

10. Changing Timelines, Griffin chart p 152, 153; Cheney’s arrival in the PEOC bunker, Griffin p 241/Reports on 9-11-01 to 9-14-01 timelines said that AA #11 struck the North Tower at 8:46 am /UA #175 struck the South Tower at 9:03 am /AA # 77 departed Dulles, DC at 8:20 am, and is claimed to have hit the Pentagon at 9:38 am/AA # 93 departed Newark, NJ at 8:42 am, and is claimed to have crashed at at10:06 am in a field in the Pennsylvania country-side amidst a passenger/crew attempt to re-take the plane. Without saying so, this Commission is stating that no planes were shot down on 9/11/01 by the United States Military or any special ops “war games” scenario à la Operation Northwoods (see Griffin, p 269).The truth of Cheney’s timeline has been verified by three recently declassified Secret Service documents (contained in Griffin’s 2017 book, Bush and Cheney: How They Destroyed America and the World, p 239.)

11. When Was the Shoot-Down Order Authorization Given?, Griffin, p 237. When Did AA Flight #93 Crash?, Griffin, p 249.

12. Mineta testimony excluded from the final report, Griffin, p 221. There are so many other omissions and distortions that you could write a book about it. In fact, a number of people have produced very credible works as part of a global research effort by such authors as Michael Chossudovsky, Thierry Meyssan, Nafeez Ahmed, Michael Ruppert, Wayne Madsen, Eric Hufschmid, Peter Lance, and Paul Thompson to name just a few. Several of the most notable omissions by this Commission would have to include the three and a half hours of testimony and documentation presented by FBI translator and whistleblower, Sibel Edmonds, who was put under a gag order, WTC janitor and rescue hero William Rodriguez’s testimony that there were explosions at the core of the North Tower where he worked that he heard while he helped explosion burn victim, Felipe David, to safety outside and returned to the building to save others twice, and much of Richard Clarke’s testimony, The National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism for the Clinton and G.W. Bush administrations.

Truth Troubadour YouTube Playlist for

9/11 Truth & Justice Songs CD Vic Sadot

Massimo Mazzucco New Pearl Harbor One of Five Parts at 911TVorg YouTube Channel in the Playlist for 9/11 & Other False Flag Investigations at Truth Troubadour YouTube Channel 

I am not Charlie Hebdo! Je suis Helric Frédou!

News Report from “La Manche Libre” in Normandy, France. Published on 01/09/2015. FRENCH text translated by Vic Sadot: “Cherbourg: Helric Frédou, former Cherbourg police Commissioner was pronounced dead – Vibrant emotions in Cherbourg. The former Central Commissioner at Limoges, well-known to police, but also to judges and elected officials, has committed suicide." See the article in French at the link below.

Helric Frédou Mort de Suicide - La Manche Libre 

More translation of the La Manche Libre news, which stated: "Helric Frédou, 44, who was central Commissioner of Cherbourg from 2010 to 2012, has committed suicide in his office of the judicial police of Limoges, during the night of Wednesday to Thursday 7th January to the 8th. A gesture of despair, he did it with his own service weapon after being asked to have his staff interview two people in connection with the investigation into the attack against Charlie Hebdo. He left no letter or information explaining his actions. The news of his death caused outrage in Cherbourg, Normandy, where the image of Mr. Frédou is still present, an image of a very professional officer and close to the people."

It has been reported that Comissioner Frédou last interviewed the family of the famous French Minister in the Sarkozy regime named Jeanette Bougrab. This is one of the outstanding questions about Comissioner Frédou's untimely death at age 44 while playing a central role in a pivotal historic event for France. Bougrab first claimed that she had been in a three year relationship with Stéphane Charbonnier, and in another interview she said it was a one year relationship. The governing corporate French media called her the "wife", the "companion", and the "lover" of Charbonnier, who they affectionately call “Charb” more often than by his actual name, such is the “objectivity” (lol) of the corporate tabloid press in the post 9/11 era. Bougrab grabbed many headlines and was interviewed all over the French media starting the very day of Charbonnier's alleged death. According to several news reports, Stéphane Charbonnier's family rejected her claims and asked her to not attend the funeral. Serious French journalists are looking into all of this! We will have to count on them to "Save the Republic!" However, like in the USA, there has been a steady corporate consolidation of the European media into a few controlling groups that seek a global corporate empire government. How can we tell the truth from the propaganda? Who really killed Helric Frédou? Who will pursue the answer to this question?

I am false flag manipulated!

Then there's the scene where a "Muslim police officer" is shot point blank in the head while laying on the sidewalk. But there is no recoil nor any blood. So that was later edited out of all news coverage on the grounds that it was too horrible to show. Yet later there is a reporter covering a scene at which the sidewalk is covered in blood but in a somewhat different location. That's a bit over-covered in videos to the point that it overshadows some more important anomalies in the official story. See Red Silver J at TeamWakeEmUp YouTube for a short documentary that gives good coverage of such aspects of the event. 

Was this the French equivalent of 9/11/01 in the USA and 7/07/05 in the UK? Will France lose its remaining civil liberties with the passage of similar repressive police state legislation? Will the event be used to further finance the terrorists in Syria already being funded by NATO? After all, the two main actors in this terror story were French citizens who went to Syria to be with the "moderate" terrorists, and were well known to French authorities. 

Some of the more interesting and well-done presentations 
this writer has read are listed with links below.

“Je Suis Hypocrite”: Enemies of ‘Freedom of Expression” 
Hijack “Charlie” in Paris - By Patrick Henningsen in 21st Centuryyy Global Research, January 13, 2015. Originally published in “21st Century Wire”.  

“Hypocrits Shine On Paris Cat Walk” 1-12-15 by Pepe Escobar. “The Paris unity march attended by over 40 world leaders has revealed the Western "double standard" approach concerning the freedom of speech and the battle against terrorism. What an unrivalled parade of political hypocrisy. The sight of General Hollande, Conqueror of Mali; David of Arabia Cameron; Angela “Let Eastern Ukrainians die” Merkel; Ahmed “Assad must go” Davutoglu; even King Sarko the First, Liberator of Libya; not to mention Bibi “Final Solution” Netanyahu – all marching for “freedom”, “free speech” and “civilization” against barbarism in the streets of Paris would make every stalwart of Western intellectual tradition, from Diogenes to Voltaire and from Nietzsche to Karl Kraus, cringe in disgust.

Charlie Hebdo - The Hidden Agenda Exposed (5:00) Storm Clouds Gathering YouTube Channel.  We don't have to speculate as to how this event is going to be used. It has already started. Sources, transcript and download links. What to do? Communicate while you can, and withdraw your obedience. 

 

  "Who Was Behind the Paris Attacks?" with Michel Chossudovsky interviewed by Bonnie Faulkner on “Guns & Butter” Radio Show on KPFA PACIFICA in Berkeley, California.  http://www.gunsandbutter.org/  

France Assaults Free Speech in the Name of Free Speech (5:22) Abby Martin on Breaking the Set YouTube Channel. RT Host. Jan 15, 2015. “Abby Martin discusses France’s hypocritical arrest of 54 French citizens, including a comedian for his controversial social media comments in the wake of a mass demonstration in Paris defending free speech.”   

Qui a commandité l’attentat contreCharlie Hebdo?

Thierry Meyssan at Voltaire Network 1-07-15 day of the attacks.

Charlie Hebdo a bondos (Charlie Hebdo - A good gift to the French corporate and Zionist captured state to use to further their “humanitarian” murdering military interventions 1-12-15 Hong Kong.

  

French comedian “Dieudonné arrested over Facebook post on Paris gunman” – The Guardian UK from Agence France-Presse 1-14-15. Quote: “Notorious French comedian Dieudonné M’bala M’bala has been arrested for being an “apologist for terrorism” after suggesting on Facebook that he sympathised with one of the Paris gunmen, a judicial source has said. Prosecutors had opened the case against him on Monday after he wrote “Tonight, as far as I’m concerned, I feel like Charlie Coulibaly” – mixing the slogan “Je suis Charlie”, used in tribute to the journalists killed at magazine Charlie Hebdo, with a reference to gunman Amédy Coulibaly. Dieudonné was arrested on Wednesday. French comedian accused of justifying terrorism after linking attacker to tribute slogan by writing ‘I feel like Charlie Coulibaly’…” 

Analyst draws on 9/11 investigations to illuminate what’s likely behind the attack on the bigoted Charlie Hebdo French cartoon journal. “Paris terrorist atrocity: a false flag,an engineered confrontation for geo-political goals” by Analyst Nikolai Starikov sorts through the verifiable facts and unverifiable “factoids” in the media about the event and the “Je suis Charlie Hebdo” media campaign in the aftermath of the attacks. Posted Jan 18, 2015 in the Syrian Free Press.  Starikov's style is as much detective work as it is journalism dealing with historical context. Excerpts: “A group of people burst into the magazine’s offices, killed people, then calmly hid themselves. In the “generous” tradition of terrorists, they left behind their ID at the locus, the French authorities told us. [As always.] What were those brothers thinking? It’s not a big job for the criminal investigators, if their ID was left behind ! Recall New York, 2001. The terrorists left behind personal documents in their autos and leaflets calling for jihad. Then, when the planes smashed into the twin towers, everything was vaporized, including the passengers’ DNA, the aircraft engines – nothing remained. But their undamaged passports, by careful planning, fell out in such a way as to be found. What’s going on here? What kind of terrorists always leave their calling card at the crime scene…500 people were thrown at that storming – 500! Even tanks were brought in – there are photographs – imagine? Tanks against two guys. The question arises: two guys, they are surrounded, there is reason to suspect their involvement in a terrorist attack. It’s a very high-profile event, to put it mildly. Should they be taken alive? Of course they should... Against that background, on the next day following the killing of these two brothers, the investigator on the case shot himself in his office. Remember, this is a high-profile story. What kind of investigator do you put on a case like this? The best… The investigator who took on the case, it appears, was most likely an honest, decent person. Once he saw that someone was being made a scapegoat, he made some statements or took some actions, as a result of which he was shot dead with his own standard-issue weapon… Half an hour after the terrorist attack, the French President arrived at the location of this tragedy. This, in principle, is impossible. Because there could be a weapons cache, bombs, trip-wires, snipers, terrorists, you name it. Question: what is the point of his going there? To show how bold he is? He is the head of state… Imagine the joy of the terrorists at killing the President! I mean, that would be a dream for those terrorists. But for some reason the President doesn’t think about that, freely arrives and makes some announcements there. That means he had a security guarantee. Who could have given such guarantees? Only those who carried out these terrorist attacks…

Analysis by Nikolai Starikov at Syrian Free Press Blog

Nikolai Starikov's analysis questions why President Hollande violated normal security protocols by going to the scene of the assault on the two veterans of the Syrian jihadi intervention now allegedly wreaking havoc in Paris. " It has to be understood that this is an instrument. It is not an independent structure, fighting against the West. It is an instrument in the hands of the West. It’s just that the West has to strike itself sometimes, in order to show an enemy to their society… Then what was the point of the march which followed? To rally society… Now they have printed 3 million copies of the insulting caricatures. What for? What does freedom of speech have to do with it? What the caricaturists had done is very nasty. Those who killed them did something even more nasty. You can’t support either side in this conflict. They just have different degrees of guilt: Killing people is a far worse crime than drawing provocative caricatures. As a result of the march, they have created an even greater provocation in the country and in all Europe, in order that this tension CONTINUES. Why is that necessary?... The economy will go downhill, not because a few journalists were killed, but because the type of economy which was built by the West is suffocating from the colossal government debt. That’s why… They need to somehow explain the ongoing natural processes of degradation of life in West. If the West fails to spark a major war, fails to destroy Russia and China, their life will become unequivocally worse. And for that they need someone to blame... Since 2001 they have been trying to present the Muslim world as the enemy.”

“Je Suis CIA” by Larry Chin in Global Research

Excerpt: “Notice that the last two false flag operations in recent months—the false flagging of North Korea over Sony and the film The Interview, and the Charlie Hebdo deception—both revolve around the ideas of “free speech” and “free expression”. This is a phantom battle, choreographed by those who could not care less for “freedoms”. In fact, the masses are being manipulated towards supporting war and mass murder, and police state agendas that specifically curtail freedoms. What more creative way to take away freedoms than to make people give them up voluntarily? The hordes of American citizens that supported the “war on terrorism” to “defend freedom” got the Patriot Act, which gutted what liberties they had; the Constitution and the Bill of Rights will not be restored. This process continues all over the world. 

The first issue of Charlie Hebdo following the alleged massacre featured 
a goofy looking Prophet Mohammad shedding a tear and saying "All is Forgiven" 
and "I am Charlie". Sales are in the millions of dollars.

Paris Shooters, French citizens exported to Syria to fight the NATO’s proxy war: brought back home to carry out a domestic job? Jan 8, 2015 Syrian Free Press by Tony Cartalucci, Bangkok-based geopolitical researcher and writer, especially known for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

From an article in French at a site called "Chaos Contrôlé" (Contolled Chaos from the strategy of tension) jeudi 8 janvier 2015 en Tous les clowns qui disent défendre la liberté d’expression étaient où quand le Gouvernement lynchait l’humoriste Dieudonné? (All of the clowns who speak of defending liberty of expression were where when the Government lynched the comedian Dieudonné?)

"It is an exceptionally barbaric act", says French President François Hollande. 

"That's not what you say when you send them to my homeland", 

says President Bashar Al-Assad of Syria. 

Jeannette Bougrab was clearly given far more attention by the governing media than the mysterious death of French Police Commissioner Helric Frédou. She was the TV and radio talk show feature and the star of the tabloid news for several days after the bizarre and questionable event. Hopefully, more serious investigations will unearth what really happened in Paris and what actually happened to the popular Monsieur Helric Frédou.

Police Commissioner Involved in Charlie Hebdo Investigation “Commits Suicide”. Total News Blackout by Michel Chossudovsky in Global Research

I am not Charlie Hebdo! 

I am Helric Frédou in search of the Truth!

Police Commissioner Involved in Charlie Hebdo Investigation “Commits Suicide”. Total News Blackout! Michel Chossudovsky “Police Commissioner Helric Fredou,  Number Two Police Officer of the Regional Service of France’s Judicial Police (JP), Limoges, (Haute-Vienne), ‘committed suicide on the night of Wednesday to Thursday at the police station.’ …  There has been a total news blackout. The French media decided or was instructed not to cover the incident. Not news worthy? So much for “Je suis Charlie” and ”Freedom of Expression” in journalism. Likewise, the Western media including all major news services (AP, AFP, Reuters, Deutsche Welle, etc)  have not covered the issue.

Truth Troubadour Blogs end with a Truth Troubadour song selection. For this blog it will have to be “Full Spectrum Dominance” - A Free song at SoundCloud! “Beware of those who joke about sending in the drones!” because "Full spectrum dominance is the policy… Making systemic violence and tyranny… Full spectrum dominance makes us all the enemy! But a better world is possible! This ain't the way it has to be!"

Questions about the Death and Dumping at Sea of Osama bin Laden

Osama bin Laden: Dead or Alive? If he is dead, when did he die?

Was he really the "mastermind of 9/11", or not?

How can we know the truth?

One thing we know is that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset used to recruit Muslim fundamentalists to fight the Russians in Afghanistan. What else do we know for sure? Why would Obama claim to have ordered a kill on Osama, and then dispose of his body at sea? Does that sound like the American way of justice? 

Dr. David Ray Griffin published “Osama bin Laden Dead or Alive” in 2009. It's a good read today! Evidence of fraud is abundant. The questions he raises need to be answered. http://noliesradio.org/archives/3230

The Corporate media spin machine has cranked out an avalanche of "reports" on the "daring" execution of a supposedly-alive Osama bin Laden hiding in a “million dollar mansion” in Pakistan. The story of the amazing commando raid may end up being another high-tech production from the same folks who brought us the lies about Pat Tillman, Jessica Lynch, & WMD in Iraq. In the case of Pat Tillman, the "official glory story" was that he got killed in a shoot out with the Taliban. Later, as the Tillman family bravely pressed on and on for the truth, the story was amended to be "friendly fire". Then the military coroner report revealed that the evidence showed that Pat Tillman was shot "by 3 bullets to the forehead at 10 yards range". Ignored AP story:

http://www.editorandpublisher.com/Departments/Top%20Stories/was-tillman-murdered-ap-gets-new-documents-35406-.aspx

In the case of Jessica Lynch, she refused to go along with the "official glory story". She testified to Congress that she was wounded by an explosion, not in a firefight. Iraqi hospital authorities informed the US military that she was alive and well and under their care. But the Pentagon sent a commando unit in there to "rescue the heroic soldier". Was the truth less important than having a recruitment poster boy and girl to use to lie to young people about corporate resource & domination wars?

In the aftermath of 9/11, we were all in "shock & awe" as the media reported “explosions” at the WTC (World Trade Center) and the Pentagon. This was rapidly revised to the "official story" that the jet fuel from the planes that hit the two tallest towers of the WTC complex "melted the steel" and caused their collapse. It's against the laws of physics! Both Dan Rather and Peter Jennings mused aloud as it was happening that the only way that steel frame buildings could be brought down by fire would be to "get at the inner structures" as in a "demolition". What's worse, the WTC buildings did not just collapse. They disintegrated to dust in 10 seconds! Building 7, which was not hit by a plane, did so in 7 seconds at around 5:30 that evening. In fact, on Sept 10, 2001 Dan Rather reported on CBS that Osama bin Laden was in a Pakistani military hospital getting dialysis treatments for kidney failure. Read about that here:

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO311A.html

If you are asking yourself how "Muslim terrorists" could get access to the 3 WTC buildings to destroy them by demolition, that is a legitimate question. It also leads to the possibility that others would more likely have such access. Kevin Ryan, who worked for the company, Underwriters Laboratories Inc, that certified the steel in the WTC, lost his job when he raised questions about the government's NIST report. He worked with a team of scientists associated with “Scholars for 9/11 Truth” to examine dust from the WTC. They published a scientific “peer review” paper that was completely ignored by the corporate media because it showed photos of microscopic particles that indicate that "nano thermate" was used in the demolition.

See www.deesillustration.com for more graphic arts like this!

Visit Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth at www.ae911truth.org 

A team of scientist and engineer published a for peer review paper in the Open Chemical Physics Journal: Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe by Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, and Bradley R. Larsen. Read about the peer review paper here at: http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/351-advanced-pyrotechnic-or-explosive-material-discovered-in-wtc-dust.html

Thermite is used in industrial demolitions. Adding sulfur makes it Thermate, which can melt steel. But only the US and some allied militaries would have access to "nano thermate". Kevin Ryan recently wrote an article on the question of access to the WTC. Interview with Kevin Ryan: "Demolition Access to the World Trade Center" on Guns & Butter on KPFA on 1-10-11. http://noliesradio.org/archives/28236

Bush and Cheney resisted having a Commission set up to investigate the events of 9/11 for almost two years. Only when victim family members, particularly a group known as "The Jersey Girls", pressed on for the truth, did they create a commission. Bush named National Security Director Condoleezza Rice's assistant, Philip Zelikow, to be Executive Director. A cover-up was predictable. Watch the movie about “The Jersey Girls”, "9/11: Press for Truth", & discuss it with friends & family: http://youtu.be/iMT2CHSvyGw

David Ray Griffin spent most of his life as a professor of theology. But once he began to investigate 9/11 he produced many good books on the subject and he has spoken all over the world about it. The "official story" was very useful propaganda in support of wars and repressive laws, which violate the Constitution. They are bad for Americans and even worse for the corporate empire's victims. This "Guns & Butter" interview with Dr. David Ray Griffin by Bonnie Faulkner on KPFA about his book "Osama Bin Laden Dead of Alive" was originally broadcast in 2009. It was especially timely to re-broadcast this on May 2, 2011, a day after President Obama made a speech stating that he ordered a special ops unit into Pakistan to execute Osama bin Laden and to dump the body into the ocean. The President claimed he gave the order to dump the body of Osama bin Laden into the ocean out of respect for Muslim practice. Is such an act not closer to Mafia practice than Muslim practice? It certainly makes it impossible to verify that bin Laden was the one killed and that that was his body that they dumped at sea! DNA could have been acquired long ago during one of bin Laden's hospital visits for kidney failure. 

How can we know the truth? By raising questions, demanding answers! Listen to the 9/11 Truth Teach-in programs at No Lies Radio, an internet-only, Pacifica affiliate station in the San Francisco Bay area.

http://noliesradio.org/archives/3230

For further investigation on your own, go to: www.911truth.org

For breaking news, go to: www.911blogger.com

To work with the “Northern California 9/11 Truth Alliance” go to: www.sf911truth.org

For music videos by Truth Troubadour Vic Sadot

www.youtube.com/truthtroubadour